Scott’s preferences, evolution, and, ahem, ‘beauty’.
Scott Adams writes the Dilbert cartoon. And blogs various topics, some of which he considers ‘true’, others of which he is interested in the reaction of others.
Today Scott wrote about preferences, how women prefer taller men. And how people choose beauty.
The usual explanation for why humans have certain preferences in mates is because the preferred traits signal good health, and that is an advantage for baby-making.
In his series The Adventures of Conrad Stargard, I think book two, High Tech Knight, author Leo Frankowski claims that in a primitive society, mate selection is made on the basis of survival and in a decadent society, mate selection is based on beauty. When choosing the right mate means you have a stout warrior, a mate likely to protect family and children, then appearance runs way lower on the list of desirables than health and skills. When survival is relatively assured, then the issues are about status and appearances count, there. So I think Scott is generalizing incorrectly when he assumes that all peoples and times set beauty as the most desirable attribute in selecting a mate. Especially when he assumes this practice spans ages, with his reference to evolution pressures. I think Leo has thought this through much better than Scott has.
Hollywood figures are marketed to sell newspapers, movies, and other media. Cosmetics and provocative clothiers pander a sexy or heavily contrived image as ‘desirable’. Beer, auto, and other companies using sex to products. It is no wonder, then, that the assumed social epitome is ‘beautiful’ – a contrived appearance that uses as many highly marketed products as possible, including silicone breasts and body jewelry and tattoos.
But I contend that in the larger picture, men still choose a mate that enhances his chance to succeed. There is less emphasis on needing children to provide for old age – so men go ga-ga over tits rebuilt to look big but no longer function biologically. We teach our daughters to be trophy wives, not crafty, homely mothers and mates. And we let Playboy and porn teach our sons to demand sex, to pick the most contrived appearance and highest social status. That is, decadence. Elsewhere in the world today, women are choosing men that can provide for a family, men are choosing a woman that can keep a home, healthy enough to bear children, and suited to surviving.
Look at those who have been in harm’s way. Just like in many novels, when times get dangerous, people tend to pair up with the nearest surviving, available, competent mate-prospect they encounter.
It is the decadent, those exuberantly and conspicuously consuming, that fit Scott’s model.
Recent Comments