Why don’t givers ask to be paid?
Saturday, December 29th, 2007Lorelle on WordPress asks the question - why don’t givers ask to be paid? Givers are those resource people friends and acquaintances turn to for help for answers, for an easy solution to a tedious task.
I think the biggest part is low self esteem.
A giver is about the opposite of the dynamic leader. The leader is usually personally ambitious, task focused, and self confident. The giver on the other hand recognizes first those that need support, rather than opportunities to advance in status and success. Why? Because the giver understands what it means to be lost, to need assistance - they identify with those needing assistance.
Rarely will a dynamic leader also express a general caring and support for those around them. The assistance they provide to others is offered from a position of strength - they assess their resources, and husband those resources as they determine what they are willing to give, and where that resource will be used. When a leader gives, the gift is expected to be used successfully.
A giver is satisfied if a gift helps another to survive - success is shared vicariously.
There are many successful roles for givers. They are valued team players, often central to the success of a group or project. But they will seldom be the leaders, or work in an ambitious fashion. Their aggression is to support the leaders, to help team mates.
Part of the heart of the question that Lorelle asks is close to home in the blogosphere. How does a giver, a resource person, ask for payment? The answers seem limited - by imagination. First, you might join a firm that pays you a salary to be a giver under the company’s banner, helping whoever the company allows access to you. Second, you can post fees for advice and assistance, and make financial arrangements a part of the request for service. You could limit free advice to short answers, and provide for contracts for those wishing assistance or more complete advice. You could keep track of all advice given, build a database of advice, and charge a modest fee for a time-window access (daily, weekly), or by the article.
In earlier times some sons or daughters of a family would forsake (or be denied) a career, instead living a life of service to parents or other family. This history of sacrifice, of taking care of family, has it’s direct descent in the giver. It would take an act of ‘tough love’ to turn the concept of performing expected service (free advice) to a business model that would balance marketing needs, support of those that ask for help, and creating an income. It would also take an evaluation and understanding of why low self-esteem wanted to give advice, instead of pursuing personal ambitions.
Giving isn’t wrong, or bad. It fills a distinct, historical niche in society. But a giver can’t afford to dream of a leader’s success, without some major self image changes. Either recognize the success of a giver - the vicarious emotional sharing of success of those the giver supports - or become more self assured, more aggressive, and more ambitious.